Cost Minimization for the Treatment of Hemophilia A

Authors

Keywords:

hemophilia A; cost minimization analysis; coagulation factor VIII; emicizumab.

Abstract

Introduction: Hemophilia A is a rare disease caused by the absence or defect of coagulation factor VIII, which leads to coagulation and bleeding problems in patients suffering from the condition.

Objectives: To describe recent studies involving cost minimization analyses for Hemophilia A.

Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar covering the period from 2019 to 2024. Keywords such as "hemophilia A," "cost minimization analysis," "coagulation factor FVIII," "emicizumab," and "pharmacoeconomics" were employed. Articles and conference abstracts published in English were included. Additionally, the selection of articles was supplemented with works describing the pathophysiology of Hemophilia A and the rationale behind the therapies available for its treatment.

Results: Replacement therapy with coagulation factor VIII is more cost-effective for treating patients with Hemophilia A, specifically those without inhibitors, compared to emicizumab. Furthermore, when comparing the various variants and formulations of coagulation factor VIII, a trend was observed indicating that products featuring a modified structure, specifically those with an extended half-life, are the most advantageous options.

Conclusions: Replacement therapy with coagulation factor VIII represents the most affordable option for patients without inhibitors. Coagulation factor VIII products with an extended half-life and structural modifications offer both clinical and economic advantages. These findings underscore the importance of considering both costs and efficacy when making therapeutic decisions regarding Hemophilia A.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Valentino LA, Santaella ME, Carlson SA, Recht M. Contemporary Approaches to Treat People with Hemophilia: What’s new and what’s not? Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2025:102696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102696

2. Debela MB, Bekele K, Zenbaba D. The prevalence of Hemophilia A in males in Africa: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2024;24(1):2582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-20165-w

3. López-Arroyo JL, Pérez-Zúñiga JM, Merino-Pasaye LE, Saavedra-González A, Alcivar-Cedeño LM, Álvarez-Vera JL, et al. Consenso de hemofilia en México. Gaceta Médica de México. 2021;157:S1-S35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/gmm.m20000451

4. Rodriguez-Merchan EC. The cost of hemophilia treatment: the importance of minimizing it without detriment to its quality. Expert Rev Hematol. 2020;13(3):269-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2020.1716726

5. López-Facundo A, Rodríguez-Castillejos C, Romero Y, Gay J, Prada D. Economic impact of inhibitors in pediatric hemophilia A. 2018;155(4):369-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24875/GMM.19004674

6. Gobierno de México ¿Qué son las enfermedades raras? | Secretaría de Salud | Gobierno | gob.mx. 2019 [acceso 24/12/2022]. Disponible en: https://www.gob.mx/salud/articulos/que-son-las-enfermedades-raras-193280

7. Chandrasekaran R, Dávoli M, Zulaiha Muda, Uendy Pérez-Lozano, Naouel Salhi, Saxena N, et al. Estimating the impact of improved management of haemophilia a on clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation and costs. BMC Research Notes. 2023;16(1):327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-023-06552-3

8. Castaman G. Hemophilia A and B: molecular and clinical similarities and differences. Haematologica. 2019;104(9):1702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2019.221093

9. Sampei Z, Igawa T, Soeda T, Okuyama-Nishida Y, Moriyama C, Wakabayashi T, et al. Identification and Multidimensional Optimization of an Asymmetric Bispecific IgG Antibody Mimicking the Function of Factor VIII Cofactor Activity. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e57479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057479

10. NORD. Hemophilia B - Symptoms, Causes, Treatment. 2023 [acceso 19/09/2023]. Disponible en: https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/hemophilia-b/

11. Pezeshkpoor B, Oldenburg J, Pavlova A. Insights into the Molecular Genetic of Hemophilia A and Hemophilia B: The Relevance of Genetic Testing in Routine Clinical Practice. Hamostaseologie. 2022;42(6):390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1945-9429

12. Nogami K, Shima M. New therapies using nonfactor products for patients with hemophilia and inhibitors. Blood. 2019;133(5):399-406. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-07-820712

13. Rodríguez-Merchan C, Soroka AB, Feoktistova SG, Mityaeva ON, Volchkov PY. Gene Therapy Approaches for the Treatment of Hemophilia B. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(13):10766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms241310766

14. Schiavoni M, Napolitano M, Giuffrida G, Coluccia A, Siragusa S, Calafiore V, et al. Status of Recombinant Factor VIII Concentrate Treatment for Hemophilia a in Italy: Characteristics and Clinical Benefits. Front Med. 2019;6:261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00261

15. Kumar S, Baldi A. Pharmacoeconomics: Principles, Methods and Economic Evaluation of Drug Therapies. PharmTechMedica. 2013 [acceso 19/09/2023];2(5):362-9. Disponible en: https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR1901882.pdf

16. Tonin FS, Aznar-Lou I, Pontinha VM, Pontarolo R, Fernandez-Llimos F. Principles of pharmacoeconomic analysis: the case of pharmacist-ledinterventions. Pharm Pract (Granada). 2021;19(1):1-10. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.18549/pharmpract.2021.1.2302

17. Duenas A. Cost-Minimization Analysis. Encycl Behav Med. 2020;570-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39903-0_1376

18. Dou L, Zhen R, Zhang Y, Li S. EE151 Cost Minimization Analysis Evaluating Turoctocog ALFA (NOVOEIGHT®) and Product X As Prophylaxis Treatment for Paediatric and Adult Patients with Severe Haemophilia a in China. Value Heal. 2022 [acceso 11/11/2023];25(7):S363-4. Disponible en: https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(22)00601-5/fulltext

19. Zanon E. Damoctocog Alfa Pegol for Hemophilia A Prophylaxis: An Italian Multicenter Survey. Pharm. 2023;16(9):1195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16091195

20. Gürsoy K, Sarıbal B, Saylan M. EE38 Cost-Minimization Analysis of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol With the Treatment of Hemophilia A in Turkey. Value Heal. 2022 [acceso 11/11/2023];25(12):S60. Disponible en: https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(22)02495-0/fulltext

21. Decker-Palmer M, Lin CW, Wilson M, McDade C, Bawa K, Kowal S, et al. Cost-Effectiveness of Emicizumab for Prophylaxis in People with Severe Hemophilia A without Inhibitors. Blood. 2022;140(Supplement_1):13041-2. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1182/blood-2022-162276

22. Sun SX, Wu Y, McDermott M, van Keep M. Cost-Effectiveness Model of Recombinant FVIII versus Emicizumab Treatment of Patients With Severe Hemophilia A Without Inhibitors. Blood. 2019;134(Supplement_1):2102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2019-124421

23. Klamroth R, Wojciechowski P, Aballéa S, Diamand F, Hakimi Z, Nazir J, et al. Efficacy of rFVIIIFc versus emicizumab for the treatment of patients with hemophilia a without inhibitors: Matching-adjusted indirect comparison of A-LONG and HAVEN Trials. J Blood Med. 2021;12:115-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S288283

24. Mancuso ME, Castaman G, Pochopien M, Aballéa S, Drzewiecka A, Hakimi Z, et al. Cost-minimization analysis of recombinant factor VIII Fc versus emicizumab for treating patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors in Europe. J Med Econ. 2022;25(1):1068-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2022.2115777

25. Monroy Cruz B, ramirez Gamez J. EE222 Cost Minimization Analysis of Damoctocog Alfa Pegol in the Treatment of Severe Hemophilia A Patients in Mexico. Value Heal. 2023 [acceso 11/11/2023];26(12):S93-4. Disponible en: https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(23)03620-3/fulltext

26. Linari S, Castaman G. Concomitant use of RFVIIA and emicizumab in people with hemophilia a with inhibitors: Current perspectives and emerging clinical evidence. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:461-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S205310

27. Carcao M, Mancuso ME, Young G, Jiménez-Yuste V. Key questions in the new hemophilia era: update on concomitant use of FVIII and emicizumab in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors. Expert Rev Hematol. 2021;14(2):143-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2021.1875817

28. Gobierno de México. Especialistas del IMSS atienden a pacientes con Hemofilia | Sitio Web “Acercando el IMSS al Ciudadano”. 2019 [acceso 11/11/2023]. Disponible en: https://www.imss.gob.mx/prensa/archivo/201904/089

29. Salinas-Escudero G, Castillo-Martínez ID, Martínez-Valverde S, Garduño-Espinosa J, Carrillo-Vega MF. Análisis de minimización de costos entre dos tratamientos a demanda de hemofilia A en niños en México ¿Son los crioprecipitados una opción más económica? Rev Hematol. 2020;21(2):92-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24245/rev_hema

30. Diminno GG, Milena L, Cabrera A, Urcia NL, Bordone R, Murillo CM, et al. Prophylaxis and hemophilia care in LATAM: Baring it all—Highlights from the CLAHT 2021 symposium. eJHaem. 2022;3(4):1287-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jha2.503

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

1.
Heyerdahl-Viau I, López-Naranjo F. Cost Minimization for the Treatment of Hemophilia A. Rev Cubana Med [Internet]. 2026 Apr. 24 [cited 2026 Apr. 29];65. Available from: https://revmedicina.sld.cu/index.php/med/article/view/5025

Issue

Section

Review articles